State Ownership and Labor Cost Stickiness: The Role of Free Cash Flows

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Payame noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Accounting Department, Payame noor university, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Prof, Department of Accounting, Gonbad-Kavoos Branch, Islamic Azad university, Gonbad-Kavoos, Iran.

10.22051/jera.2024.47577.3265

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of free cash flows on the relationship between government ownership and labor cost stickiness while providing evidence of how non-economic considerations and socio-political goals influence cost behavior. Unlike other owners, state-owned companies pursue socio-political interests and broader social objectives compared to private firms, which contributes to cost stickiness. The statistical population consists of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2013 to 2022. Companies in the investment, insurance, banking, credit institution, holding, and leasing sectors were excluded due to the specific nature of their activities. Only companies with continuous operations throughout the research period and fiscal years ending in March were included. Ultimately, a final sample of 151 companies, representing 1,498 company-years, was selected. The findings indicate that government ownership positively affects cost stickiness, and free cash flows reinforce the relationship between government ownership and labor cost stickiness. These results suggest that, driven by socio-political interests, state-owned companies pursue broader social goals than private firms, leading to increased cost stickiness

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

ابراهیمی، سعید. فرجی، امید. عرب زاده، میثم. ایزدپور، مصطفی. محمدرضایی، فخرالدین.(1401). مالکیت دولتی و رفتار نامتقارن هزینه ها، بورس اوراق بهادار، 15(57) ، 530-495.
برزگر، قدرت الله. شیرازی، زهرا.(1400). بررسی چسبندگی هزینه نیروی کار با رویکرد مقایسه ای صنایع استراتژیک و مالکیت دولتی، رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین در مدیریت و حسابداری، 5(58) ، 155-142.
پارسایی، منا، سهرابی.، سارا. (1401). بدهی‌های تجاری و چسبندگی هزینه‌ها با تأکید بر مشکل نمایندگی و تمرکز مشتری. پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری. 12(2)، 90-65 .
سجادی، علی.(1397). بررسی رابطه بین بیش اطمینانی و عملکرد آتی شرکت، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه ساری.
صفرزاده، محمدحسین، و بیگ پناه، بهزاد. (1394). چسبندگی هزینه حسابرسی مستقل در شرکت های ایرانی. حسابداری مالی، 7(27)، 53-76.
صیادی، محمد.، بدرآبادی، محمد.، مرادخانی ملال، بهنام. (1398). چسبندگی هزینه، تمرکز مالکیت و ناکارایی سرمایه گذاری در شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران.  نشریه علمی رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین مدیریت و حسابداری، 3(11)، 130-112.
قدرتی زوارم، عباس.، نوروزی، محمد.، روزخوش، مرضیه.، نجاری، عظیمه. (1401). بررسی اثر هموارسازی سود و ساختار مالکیت بر چسبندگی هزینه. چشم انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 5(58)، 106-94.
عنایت پورشیاده، ابراهیم.، مرادی، زهرا.، اسدی فر، احد.، درخشان، جواد. (1398). تاثیر تمرکز مالکیت بر رابطه بین چسبندگی هزینه و ریسک شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه چشم انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 2(20)، 25-1.
نقش بندی، نادر.، اکبرخانی، محمدعلی.، کشتگر، الهام. (1398). بررسی تاثیر چسبندگی هزینه و تمرکز مالکیت بر ریسک شرکت. چشم انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 2(18)،47-28.
نمازی، محمد.،  فتحعلی، اکرم. (1397). بررسی اثر سرمایه فکری و جریان نقد آزاد بر چسبندگی هزینه‌ها در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری، 4(8)، 250-223.
Namazi, M. & G. Rezaei.(2015). Examining the impact of accruals quality and information relevance on the agency costs of the companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting Quarterly, 11( 44): 37-69.(in persian)
 
Anderson, M. C.; Lee, Joo Hyung. & Mashruwala, Raj. (2016): Cost stickinesss and cost inertia: A two-driver model of asymmetric cost behavior. Available online at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm.
Anderson, R.C. & Reeb, D.M.(2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, Vol. 58, No. 3, Pp. 1301–1328.
Anderson, M. C. ;Banker, R. D. & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative cost “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63.
Anderson, M. C.; Banker, R. D.; Huang, R. & Janakiraman, S. N. (2007). Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance, 22(1), 1–28.
Bai, C., Li, D. D., Tao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2000). A multitask theory of state enterprise reform. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(4), 716–738.
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D. & Chen, T. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111–127.
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Fang, S., & Liang, Y. (2018). Cost management research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 187–209.
Ben-Nasr, H., Boubakri, N. & Cosset, J-C. (2012). The political determinants of the cost of equity: Evidence from newly privatized firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 605–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00435.x
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C. & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 641–658. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007.
Calleja, K., Steliaros, M. & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17, 127–140. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001.
Chen, Clara Xiaoling; Gores, Timo. & Nasev, Julia (2013): Managerial overconfidence and cost stickiness. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com.
Chen, C. X., Lu, H. & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282.
Chune, Young Chunga. Seok-Kyun, Hura. & Chang, Liu. (2019). Institutional investors and cost stickiness: Theory and evidence. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 336-350.
Cohen,S.;  Karatzimas, S. & Naoum, V.S. 2017,"The sticky cost phenomenon at the local government level: empirical evidence from Greece", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282.
Dierynck, B.; Landsman, W. R., & Renders, A. (2012). Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms. In: The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1219–1246.
Enayat Pourshiadeh, Ebrahim.; Moradi, Zahra.; Asadifar, Ahad. & Derakhshan, Javad. (2018). The effect of ownership concentration on the relationship between cost stickiness and risk of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Management Perspectives Quarterly, 2(20), 1-25.(In Persian).
Golden, J.; Mashruwala,  R. & Pevzner, M. (2020). "Labor adjustment costs and asymmetric cost behavior: An extension." Management Accounting Research, 46: 100647.
Gudari Zavarem, Abbas.; Nowrozi, Mohammad; Rozkhosh, Marzieh. & Najari, Azima. (1401). Investigating the effect of profit smoothing and ownership structure on cost stickiness. Accounting and Management Perspectives, 5(58), 106-94.(In Persian).
Hall, C. M. (2016). Does ownership structure affect labor decisions? The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1671–1696.
Hartlieb, S. & Loy, T. R. (2020). Does community social capital affect asymmetric cost behavior? Management Accounting Research, 46, 1-15.
Hartlieb, S. & Loy, T. R. (2022). The impact of cost stickiness on financial reporting: evidence from income smoothing. Accounting & Finance, 62(3), 3913-3950.
 
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? In: Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201–224.
Krisnadewi, K.A. & Soewarno, N. (2021). Optimism and profit-based incentives in cost stickiness: an experimental study. Journal of Management Control. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00309-w
Kuiate, C. & Noland, T.R. (2019), "Attracting and retaining core competency: a focus on cost stickiness", Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 678-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-04-2018-0038.
Kou, M. (2022, October). R&D Cost Stickiness and Enterprise Performance Based on Empirical Test Using WEISS Model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Economy, Data Modeling and Cloud Computing, ICIDC 2022, 17-19 June 2022, Qingdao, China.
 
Maaloul, A.; Chakroun, R. & Yahyaoui, S. (2016). The effect of political connections on companies’ performance and value: Evidence from Tunisian companies after the revolution. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8 (2), 185-204.
Maher, M.W.; Stickney, C.P.& Weil, R.L. (2008). Manangerial accounting: An introduction to concepts, methods and uses (10th ed.). Manson: Thomson Higher Education.
Megginson, W. L. (2005). The financial economics of privatization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Micco, A.; Panizza, U. & Yanez, M. (2007). Bank ownership and performance: Does politics matter? Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(1), 219–241.
Naqshbandi, Nader.; Akbarkhani, Mohammad Ali. & Keshtgar, Elham. (2018). Investigating the impact of cost stickiness and ownership concentration on company risk. Accounting and Management Perspectives, 2(18), 47-28.(In Persian).
Namazi, Mohammad. & Fathali, Akram. (2017). Investigating the effect of intellectual capital and free cash flow on cost stickiness in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Experimental Accounting Research, 4(8), 223-250.(In Persian).
Noreen, E. (1991). Conditions under which activity-based cost systems provide relevant costs. In: Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3(4), 159–168.
Parsaei, M. & sohrabi, S. (2022). Trade Credit and Cost Stickiness Focusing on the Agency Problem and Customer Concentration. Empirical Research in Accounting, 12(2), 65-90. doi: 10.22051/jera.2022.39783.2989
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.report-2016.html
Prabowo,R. Hooghiemstra, R. & Van Veen-Dirks, P.(2018). “State Ownership، Socio-political Factors، and Labor Cost Stickiness”. European Accounting Review،Vol.27, NO.4, Pp 771-796.
Richardson, S.(2006). Over-investment of Free Cash Flows. Review of Accounting Studies: 11, 159–189.
Redhwan, A. & Ismai, K. K. (2014). An Investigation into the Effect of Surplus Free Cash Flow, Corporate Governance and Firm Size on Earnings Predictability, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management: 22 (2) ,118-133.
Salehi, M.; Asadian, A. & Khansalar, E. (2023), "The effect of intellectual capital on audit fees stickiness", Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-07-2020-0217.
Sayadi, Mohammad.; Badrabadi, Mohammad. & Moradkhani Melal, Behnam. (2018). Cost stickiness, ownership concentration and investment inefficiency in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange.  Scientific Journal of New Management and Accounting Research Approaches, 3(11), 112-130.(In Persion).
Sharma, P.  & Manikutty, S. (2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure & community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(3), 293–311.
Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133–150.
Stulz, R., (1990). Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies. Journal of Financial Economics: 26, 3–27.
Xue, S. & Hong, Y. (2016). Earnings Management, corporate governance and expense stickiness. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 41-58.
Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts' earnings forecasts. In: The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471.
Yasukata, K.  & Kajiwara,T. (2011). Are Sticky Costs the Result of Deliberate Decision of Managers? .Online: http://www.ssrn.com.
Zuijlen, W. (2012), Cost behavior in a period of economic crisis and the effect of the frequency of updating information on cost behavior. Master’s thesis, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 18 September

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 June 2024
  • Revise Date: 13 November 2024
  • Accept Date: 16 November 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics